urban-perplexities:

urban-perplexities:

urban-perplexities:

I finally have my edibles shop up and running!!! 😁 For any of you in the continental US who love to get lit 🔥 and wanna support a Black Queer small business, feel free to hmu or follow my IG. Everything is made to order and I’m slowly working on adding more vegan and gluten free options. Be on the lookout for our PRIDE and JUNETEENTH specials 🥰🖖🏾

Soooooo…We finally launched our PRIDE boxes and they’re honestly so cute I could cry! 😆 I just sent out the very first one (with a special surprise for the friend who ordered it). I’ll post pictures soon, but if you guys are looking for a fun way to get fucced up this summer for a great price, hit up my queer ass and let’s get weird lol

These both turned out so nicely and i really was just out here wingin it lol. I can’t wait to make more of these and really create something fun that you guys can enjoy 🥰

just-a-lonely-nobody:

(via becherdireinen)

only-cat-memes:

Yourdailydoseofcatmemes

(via becherdireinen)

ur-daily-inspiration:

(via becherdireinen)

spongebobssquarepants:

(via pikamans)

calamitys-child:

zoestorm:

skyeelmao:

He’s so fucking stupid <3

Sound on I beg you

Audio: A cartoonish “bonk” as the cat hits the tank followed by a person’s muffled laughter

(via ashleybenlove)

ukulelekatie:

anyone else feel like they’re constantly in a state of doing and folding and putting away laundry

(via jparadox)

stasi-informant-deactivated2021:

(via sparrow-va)

prokopetz:

x-cetra:

prokopetz:

To be fair, there are perfectly practical filmmaking reasons why cool guys don’t look at explosions:

1. Most low to medium budget productions don’t use compositing or CGI to put the actor in the same shot as the explosion – they just put the actor much further away from the explosion than you think they are, and use forced perspective tricks to minimise the apparent distance. There are a limited number of camera angles those tricks permit, and most of them require the actor to be directly between the explosion and the camera.
   
2. In spite of the fact that the distance between the explosion and the actor is larger than you think, mistakes happen, and the best way to avoid catching a piece of flying debris in the eye is to direct your line of sight away from the explosion.

“Cool guy slowly walking away from explosion” happens to be a very obvious way of satisfying both of those safety constraints.

Originally posted by thisbluespirit

Example of #2: Seventh Doctor in classic Doctor Who not flinching when the fucking pyrotechnics department actually burned holes in his coat

(multiple clips from his era are now examples in the BBC’s workplace safety training tapes)

Yeah, that’s a fantastic example of how not to do it. The “correct” low-budget approach would have been to show him exiting the building, then quickly cut to a different camera angle for the walking away from the explosion part, using forced perspective to conceal the fact that he’s teleported 30 feet between shots A and B.

aminta:

bidens america

(via mariamlovesyou)

joshpeck:

the term “i love to boggy” will now be incapable of leaving my lexicon anytime soon

(via captorcorp)

handweavers:

handweavers:

who are you when you are not watching tv or movies? when you aren’t playing video games or reading a book or fanfiction or listening to music or whatever other kind of media that you engage with? who are you when your mind isn’t in another world or story, when you are forced to sit with yourself and the only experience you have is your own sensorial life? can you define yourself outside of what you consume? who is that person? do you like them? can you bear it? can you bear it?

i am not asking if you can sit completely still and do absolutely nothing. are the only options a) consuming media or b) doing nothing? what lies outside of that? if you were to create space for a version of you outside of that, who might that be?

(via ahivemindoftwelvecati)

wandering-pteryx:

greatmountainfloofsquatch:

weeee:

Time shifting

––

I wanted this but the original poster is transphobic

It’s the Analog “Hole”. It’s exploitable. Only issue is losing some quality, but if your equipment is good, you can get pretty decent quality.

There’s actually an even simpler version that significantly reduces the quality loss! Double ended audio cable

simply plug on end into the speaker port and tell the computer it’s headphones, plug the other end into the mic port and tell the computer it’s a microphone, and then hit play on your media and Audacity! No digital/analogue translation required.

(via ahivemindoftwelvecati)